September’s LandThink Pulse revealed 63.8% of respondents would not purchase land without the mineral rights being transferred.
Minerals such as oil, natural gas, metals, and coal can prove to be a very profitable to a landowner if they can be developed. Most of the time, “surface” rights and “subsurface” or mineral rights of land, are not owned by the same person. It’s common for mineral rights to be retained by a previous owner or leased to an oil or gas company with the resources for development. Once mineral rights have been severed from surface rights, it makes the resale of the property tricky. Buyer’s involved in mineral rights purchases should consult an attorney that specializes in mineral rights law.
Last month, the September Pulse asked: Would you purchase land without the mineral rights being transferred? The overwhelming answer to our informal online survey was “NO”, given by 63.8% of those responding. Only 36.2% said “YES”, they would purchase land without the mineral rights being conveyed.
The results of the survey were not surprising. Mineral rights are hot topic, especially in the Western United States. In our fuel-based economy, minerals underneath the surface can be lucrative for landowners.
Here’s how the final results panned out:
- 63.8% answered NO, they would not purchase land without the mineral rights
- 36.2% answered YES, they would purchase land without the mineral rights
Congratulations to Scott Shuman, winner of the $50 Amazon gift card after answering the September Pulse question! Scott is an Auction Specialist with Hall and Hall at their Eaton, Colorado, office location.
Thank you to everyone who participated and shared the Pulse with friends and connections in the land industry.
LandThink is seeking sponsors for the November LandThink Pulse and months thereafter. Sponsorship of the Pulse is an excellent opportunity for land industry businesses and professionals to receive significant exposure by leveraging our entire network of web and social media sites. Pulse sponsorships are offered on a first come first serve basis and are subject to certain limitations. If your business would be interested in sponsoring next month’s November Pulse question, please contact us soon.
In your opinion, is owning land that adjoins a national forest, park or wildlife refuge an advantage or disadvantage? Tell us what you think! Click here to answer the October Pulse question. All respondents will be automatically entered to win a $50 Amazon gift card!
This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of LANDTHINK. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law. The articles, posts, comments, opinions and information provided by LANDTHINK are for informational and research purposes only and DOES NOT substitute or coincide with the advice of an attorney, accountant, real estate broker or any other licensed real estate professional. LANDTHINK strongly advises visitors and readers to seek their own professional guidance and advice related to buying, investing in or selling real estate.