Pulse Results

LANDTHINK Pulse: States Should have the Right to Sue Each Other Over Water Rights

LandThink Pulse: States Should have the Right to Sue Each Other Over Water Rights

According to April’s LANDTHINK Pulse results, 57.53% of respondents believed that states should have the right to sue each other over water rights. Conflict between states over water rights continues to intensify, and one of the most talked-about cases in the news has been the decades-old feud between Florida and Georgia over water flow into Apalachicola Bay in the Florida Panhandle. This on-going battle between Georgia and Florida is just one example of a growing problem facing many areas of the United States. Metropolitan growth, urban development, and extreme drought across the West have resulted in a dwindling water supply.

Last month, the April Pulse asked: Should states have the right to sue each other over water rights?

This turned out to be a relatively divided issue among our audience. Our informal online survey revealed that 57.53% of those responding said “YES”, states SHOULD have the right to sue each other over water rights. Coming in a close second, 42.47% of our audience answered “NO”, states SHOULD NOT have the right to sue each other over water rights. Water woes and interstate disputes over water rights are poised to increase, as consumption exceeds supply. There is a limit to the amount of water our streams, river basins, federal reservoirs, and aquifers can provide.

Here are the final results:

April 2014 LANDTHINK Pulse Results

  • 57.53% said states SHOULD have the right to sue each other over water
  • 42.47% said states SHOUD NOT have the right to sue each other over water

Thank you to everyone who participated and shared the Pulse with friends and connections in the land industry.

LANDTHINK is seeking sponsors for the June LANDTHINK Pulse and months thereafter. Sponsorship of the Pulse is an excellent opportunity for land industry businesses and professionals to receive significant exposure by leveraging our entire network of web and social media sites. Pulse sponsorships are offered on a first come first serve basis and are subject to certain limitations. If your business would be interested in sponsoring next month’s June Pulse question, please contact us soon.

Do you have a suggestion for next month’s Pulse question? Submit your question here and we might choose yours!

Should a farmer who receives government subsidies be allowed to sell their crop to the export markets? Tell us what you think! Click here to answer the May Pulse question!

This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of LANDTHINK. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law. The articles, posts, comments, opinions and information provided by LANDTHINK are for informational and research purposes only and DOES NOT substitute or coincide with the advice of an attorney, accountant, real estate broker or any other licensed real estate professional. LANDTHINK strongly advises visitors and readers to seek their own professional guidance and advice related to buying, investing in or selling real estate.

About the author

LANDTHINK

LANDTHINK is part of the LANDFLIP family of sites and brings together the various components of the land industry and provides knowledge and information to land investors, owners and professionals to create a stronger land marketplace. Get land smart!

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

The Pulse

In your opinion, what is a fair price to pay for leasing good hunting land?

ANSWER

THE PULSE SPONSORED BY:

RANCHFLIP

JOIN NOW
SUBSCRIBE

Join our newsletter to get exclusive content!

Get land smart with all the latest land knowledge, trends, ideas & much more.
close-link

Tell us what you think!

In your opinion, what is a fair price to pay for leasing good hunting land?
ANSWER NOW
close-link