Buying Land

Prices and Present Value: From Trans Ams to Timberlands

Prices and Present Value: From Trans Ams to Timberlands

When inflation rises, people talk about it. In my calls with forest industry investors and executives, these discussions center on current and future costs, prices, and cash flows. Generally, I observe that inflation increases fear by fogging the crystal ball of cash flow models and fueling uncertainty in planning sessions. However, inflation and other macroeconomic turbulence also embolden those armed with simple business strategies focused on the fundamental performance of real assets, something we address in our annual “Wood Flows & Cash Flows” conference. For those firms, questions are less about “what should we do?” and more about “what can we learn?”

Prices Convey Information

In elementary school, I prized the Pontiac Firebird (and the Trans Am driven by Burt Reynolds in “Smokey and the Bandit”). Unfortunately, as a fourth grader with a fifty-cent allowance, I simply could not rake enough leaves or mow enough lawns to pay for one. In this way and at a young age, prices paid and charged taught me basic economic lessons related to competitive advantages (kids doing lawn work have few) and scarcity (Trans Ams).

In forestry, timber prices provide critical information about regional timber markets. For example, the lower per unit log prices in the U.S. South as compared to the Pacific Northwest reflect, in great part, the relative abundance of timber in the U.S. South. The prices, while incomplete as sources of local market intel, do help us understand the economic fundamentals required to profit in the region.

Regional forest industry fundamentals are known by those in the business. The moving of softwood lumber capacity across North America from Western Canada and the Northwest to the U.S. South, changes in timberland ownership, and factors driving pulp fiber costs comprise a few. However, big shifts take time in the forest industry. Years and decades, not days and weeks. So, as new macro events occur, we ask, “how might this change our understanding of where things are already headed? And when?”

Prices Allocate Resources

Consumer preferences affect the use of natural resources. In the case of trees and forests, people buy lumber, paper, baseball bats and other products made of wood. When people choose between red oak or white oak for furniture, or between cedar or treated pine for decking, they inform a process that bids for the forest-derived raw materials from which these products are made. When we layer in other “products” such as carbon offsets, the market gains complexity or liquidity, depending on your view. This further reinforces the value of clear, reliable price signals by which forest owners can make decisions.

This allocation has potential implications if the marketplace ultimately views the use of trees for lumber versus, for example, carbon sequestration as direct alternatives (see “How Could Forest Carbon Markets Affect Timberland Investments?“). However, immediate and compelling questions focus on separating the speculative from the realizable cash flows associated with forest carbon in timberland transactions and valuations.

When I talk with timberland appraisers, we discuss the challenges of capturing emerging values and cash flows in their work. They understand, as well as anyone, that a great deal of the confidence and integrity associated with timberland investments links to prudent, consistently applied, and quantifiable estimates of value.

Improving an Asset Increases its Present Value

Please take the easy wins. Land gets more valuable when you plant it and put it to work. While investors value and acquire timberlands based on their potential to generate cash flows in the future, these lands become immediately more valuable as we improve them with NPV-positive projects. Improved forest management, better roads, and new recreational leases get immediately reflected in any updated assessment of value. The future prospects for harvesting trees during poor weather by improving the roads or the reduced risk from installing fire breaks instantly increases the value of your forest over the neighbor’s, all other things being equal.

This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of LANDTHINK. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law. The articles, posts, comments, opinions and information provided by LANDTHINK are for informational and research purposes only and DOES NOT substitute or coincide with the advice of an attorney, accountant, real estate broker or any other licensed real estate professional. LANDTHINK strongly advises visitors and readers to seek their own professional guidance and advice related to buying, investing in or selling real estate.

About the author

Brooks Mendell, Ph.D.

Brooks Mendell, Ph.D. is President and Founder of Forisk Consulting, a forest industry, timber REIT, bioenergy and timber market research firm. Dr. Mendell has over fifteen years of operating, research, and consulting experience in forest business and finance. Mendell has published over sixty articles and two books on topics related to timber and timberland REITs and markets, forest business management and operations, and communication skills.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Pulse Question

Should foreign investors be allowed to buy land in the U.S.?

ANSWER

Subscribe to LANDTHINK

Get the latest land articles and news sent to your inbox. Get land smart!

SUBSCRIBE