Pulse Results

Pulse: Large Scale Energy Farms Deemed Misuse of Fertile Land

Pulse: Large Scale Energy Farms Deemed Misuse of Fertile Land

Last month, the LANDTHINK Pulse posed the following question to our audience: Do you support using fertile land for producing renewable energy (wind turbines/solar panels) instead of growing crops?

Our informal online survey revealed that 66.22% of respondents believe that prime farmland being put into renewable energy is not the best use of the land. An emerging renewable energy industry has ushered in the development of massive solar farms and utility-scale wind turbine projects all across the country. Farmland makes an ideal site for both solar panels and wind turbines; it offers hundreds of acres of cleared land, that most large-scale projects require.

Farmers facing financial difficulties surmount the low commodity prices and lingering drought by leasing their land to utility companies for sustainable power alternatives. Leasing fertile cropland to solar companies and wind developers can bring in enough revenue to keep the farm in the family, a better alternative than selling the property to developers.

Renewable energy companies offer top-dollar per acre rent. Since the energy can be harvested forever, it’s a steady stream of income for farmers that is not influenced by commodity prices. According to the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), wind power pays landowners $245 million in lease payments every year. Solar farms can lease land at prices ranging from $400-$1200 per acre, depending on location and site characteristics for the land.

The LANDTHINK audience strongly expressed their opinion on the use of productive agricultural land for generating energy instead of growing crops. The majority of our audience, 66.22% of respondents, said “NO”, saying they DO NOT support using fertile land for energy projects. Only 33.78% answered “YES”, saying they DO support the installation of such energy projects on cropland.

As our survey revealed, the majority of the public and many policy makers oppose installing energy farms on fertile farmland, convinced that it will forever ruin the productivity of the land. Herbicides used to control the weeds under solar panels, the extensive land moving and excavation required to cut-in roads and install wind turbines, coupled with the loss of the farmland itself and eventually businesses supporting the agricultural industry (seed, chemical, equipment dealers) are a few reasons why placing renewable energy farms on fertile farmland is viewed unfavorably.

Some people may ask “Why not grow crops and install renewable energy projects on the same parcel of land?” Often, farmers do supplement income by installing solar panels on a portion of their farmland. Currently, there are some conflicting reports as to whether or not crops can be grown successfully underneath wind turbines. Data has shown that turbulence, along with shade thrown from the turbine, can alter the weather in their immediate vicinity – influencing temperature, humidity and precipitation- all which affect growing and soil conditions underneath. The turbines also make aerial crop spraying difficult, if not impossible.

Here are the final results:

Pulse Results: April 2017

  • 66.22% said NO, they DO NOT support using fertile land for producing renewable energy
  • 33.78% said YES, they DO support using fertile land for producing renewable energy

Thank you to everyone who participated and shared the Pulse with friends and connections in the land industry.

Become a Pulse sponsor! It’s a great way to ensure your brokerage is the first one buyers and sellers call when they have a need to buy or sell property. You’ll get insane exposure on Social + Email + Web. That’s 500,000+ monthly eyes on you! Once you have it, you won’t want to give it up! Pulse sponsorships are offered on a first come first serve basis and are subject to certain limitations. If your business would be interested in sponsoring the June Pulse question, please contact us soon.

Do you have a suggestion for next month’s Pulse question? Submit your question and we might choose yours!

We want to know what you think about our May Pulse question: Do you support the new tariffs placed on Canadian softwood lumber imports? Answer now.

This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of LANDTHINK. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law. The articles, posts, comments, opinions and information provided by LANDTHINK are for informational and research purposes only and DOES NOT substitute or coincide with the advice of an attorney, accountant, real estate broker or any other licensed real estate professional. LANDTHINK strongly advises visitors and readers to seek their own professional guidance and advice related to buying, investing in or selling real estate.

About the author


LANDTHINK is part of the LANDFLIP network of sites and brings together the various components of the land industry and provides knowledge and information to land investors, owners and professionals to create a stronger land marketplace. Get land smart!

1 Comment

Click here to post a comment

  • Big Oil is Toxic and slowly killing everything, so to sacrifice a little land is worth getting clean energy. Another solution is just have solar panels systems on every home. However, Big oil is outdated and no longer needed.However,It makes a certain group”Oil Tycoons”way too much MONEY for them to give a shit about us and our Earth. It’s all about CONTROL! Control the product, control the population who need it.

Pulse Question

If you were buying land, how likely would you be to choose owner financing if it was offered?


Subscribe to LANDTHINK

Get the latest land articles and news sent to your inbox. Get land smart!